sumyungguy (more pictures added)

Author Topic: sumyungguy (more pictures added)  (Read 31277 times)

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2007, 06:40:53 PM »
04-02-07

Won an auction for a real Dinan chip last night, Im going to try and get the car on the dyno for a before and after and also check the a/f.
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

turbo_negro69

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 129
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2007, 09:06:33 PM »
Nice car, my sister lives out in Tracy. Loving the smoked fog lights!
I think we need to have a bay area meet before Bimmerfest (besides the baybimmerz meet).
I think you need a RyanG splitter for that IS lip.:D

91-318i SOLD : (
91-318is for sale
95-740i DD
84-Monte carlo SS Under construction
90-T-bird Supercoupe DD

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #32 on: April 03, 2007, 02:18:55 AM »
I'm definitely down for a meet.. when? where?
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

jpod999

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #33 on: April 03, 2007, 02:56:46 PM »
How far is Tracy from the bay?  Roughly that is...


Thanks to Brad at http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/7567/ticevalleysiggv7.jpg">Shutterflick.com for editing the sig.

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #34 on: April 03, 2007, 03:19:04 PM »
Im only 25min from Pleasanton..
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

jpod999

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #35 on: April 03, 2007, 06:57:55 PM »
Oh snap, lets get something going over at baye30 then.


Thanks to Brad at http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/7567/ticevalleysiggv7.jpg">Shutterflick.com for editing the sig.

gearheadE30

  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1245
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #36 on: April 04, 2007, 10:22:29 AM »
Wish I lived over there....Indy, the "crossroads of America" seems to be almost E30-free except for me :(

1991 318is Turbo
1989 Caprice Classic Wagon named Humphrey
1979 Suzuki GS750E

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #37 on: April 10, 2007, 02:00:37 AM »
04-09-07

Got a chance to get on the dyno today. I did two baselines then installed the Dinan chip and ran two runs. While only getting a few more peak wheel horsepower and torque, the mid range picked up in needed places and the air/fuel looks better pretty much 13:1 all the way across the board (the graph says 14 but -1 for cat). This was done on a Dynojet with a wideband at the tailpipe.

The power results are ok but on the road the power feels much smoother and the new revs are great, I'll admit I was discourage when I was on the dyno but the Kool-aid smile poked its head out on the drive home.

here's the data..
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 02:02:40 AM by sumyungguy »
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

gearheadE30

  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1245
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #38 on: April 10, 2007, 06:30:54 PM »
Huh, I would have expected a bit more out of a chip. Any idea how the dinan compares to the MarkD?

1991 318is Turbo
1989 Caprice Classic Wagon named Humphrey
1979 Suzuki GS750E

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #39 on: April 10, 2007, 09:15:12 PM »
Quote from: gearheadE30;23441
Huh, I would have expected a bit more out of a chip. Any idea how the dinan compares to the MarkD?

On the street this a noticeable difference in the power band and the attitude of the motor, I dont have any experience with the MarkD..
« Last Edit: April 11, 2007, 02:58:29 AM by sumyungguy »
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

EducatedFool

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #40 on: April 10, 2007, 09:43:28 PM »
From what I hear, the MarkD chip is the way to go. But I have no experience w/ any chip, so yeah...

jpod999

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #41 on: April 10, 2007, 11:50:57 PM »
You have an exhaust too?


Thanks to Brad at http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/7567/ticevalleysiggv7.jpg">Shutterflick.com for editing the sig.

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #42 on: April 11, 2007, 02:56:03 AM »
Quote from: jpod999;23483
You have an exhaust too?


not really, I just went to a muffler shop and had them but on a stock replacement with a resonator, its still all 2.25 piping.

Are these #'s low far a stock m42? I think my cat leaks so there might be some loss there and my plug wires are still the originals (savin up for the COP).. These make a claimed 140@130 at the crank stock so 121@112 at the wheels should be decent right?
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped

Alpine003

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 848
    • View Profile
sumyungguy
« Reply #43 on: April 11, 2007, 11:47:22 AM »
Quote from: sumyungguy;23375
04-09-07

Got a chance to get on the dyno today. I did two baselines then installed the Dinan chip and ran two runs. While only getting a few more peak wheel horsepower and torque, the mid range picked up in needed places and the air/fuel looks better pretty much 13:1 all the way across the board (the graph says 14 but -1 for cat). This was done on a Dynojet with a wideband at the tailpipe.

The power results are ok but on the road the power feels much smoother and the new revs are great, I'll admit I was discourage when I was on the dyno but the Kool-aid smile poked its head out on the drive home.

here's the data..


Interesting results. Far from the 10-15hp that is often claimed on these chips. If you are willing to go to the dyno again, I can loan you my MarkD 93 oct chip. But depending on results, I might never get it back. ;)

sumyungguy

  • b.wood
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
    • http://www.shutterflick.com
sumyungguy
« Reply #44 on: April 11, 2007, 10:01:10 PM »
Quote from: Alpine003;23523
Interesting results. Far from the 10-15hp that is often claimed on these chips. If you are willing to go to the dyno again, I can loan you my MarkD 93 oct chip. But depending on results, I might never get it back. ;)


I would be fine with that, I have two dyno's at my disposal. But the only problem is that I dont have 93 octane around here, and its kinda unfair to compare the Dinan 91 octane mild tune to the MarkD.. 10-15hp at the crank but not to the wheels, but there where some 10hp gains in the mid range.. Ill say it again the car feels better on the street.
brad™
bradthephotog.com  :: myBlog :: Canon Equipped