Author Topic: 318is turbo with itb's  (Read 34406 times)

ahriley91

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« on: December 22, 2009, 09:13:10 PM »
Has anyone seen an e30 318is with itb's and a turbo? Post anything that you find because i am interested in starting this project. I am aware of all of the custom fabrications that would be needed to make this happen. What would be necessary to make this possible? Anything and everything will help. Thanks.

AcSchnitzer318is

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 12:13:12 AM »
LOL... you got me all excited.  I thought you were posting about one you had done or found on the interwebs.  :(

A buddy of mine has a set of Hyabusa ITB's and it definitely got me thinking... then I realized I have enough to think about getting the car completely tuned on MS to worry about throwing another variable in there.  

Hopefully someone knows of one and posts it.


"A good memory for quotes combined with a poor memory for attribution can lead to a false sense of originality."

ahriley91

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 12:17:27 AM »
I actually have found some people who have done it, but they don't explain how they did it. It is very annoying. I'll post a link. It's actually some guys photobucket. haha.

http://s90.photobucket.com/albums/k267/Bonje_80/318is%20turbo/?action=view¤t=IMG_1064.jpg

1991 E30 M42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 835
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2009, 02:00:12 AM »
itb's are redundant with a turbo, save your money and buy an AEM ems

95isTurbo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2009, 03:15:51 AM »
http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/2009-12-18190731.jpg

That redundant piece is mine by the way.
GSX-R 1000 FTW
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

e30guydownunder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 171
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2009, 03:37:20 PM »
^^^^ Have you got a build thread kicking around

ahriley91

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2009, 04:07:27 PM »
Is it really that redundant? I wouldn't think that it would be that redundant. More air flow. Would a new intake be just as useful? I want to know what kinda power it would make. Any videos or build threads would be nice. I'm mostly interested in learning about it.

95isTurbo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2009, 04:14:54 AM »
Trial and Error was the way , but if you go back to the basics its a motor detuned to street level with focus on economy and reliability and one of the features that does that on this excellent engine is the intake manifold , and average gains from a intake manifold would be anywhere from 10-30hp with a tune and some adjustments of the motor (cams) .

The reason i went with ITBs on my turbo set up is to let the motor breathe better and throttle response for drifting and getting rid of that wacky restrictive Intake Manifold .

The old car was a 95 318is (RIP) that i had for 4 years (2yrs Boosted)
And the silver 97 M3 is my current project ,
and yes i sold the whole m3 drivetrain out of that car and dropped the m42 in there with all the other goodies i had from my 318 and then some the car should be done within a month im doing the turbo piping right now and now it will have that ITB manifold with the haltech that i bought of this forum im shooting for 300whp on stock motor and in some time with a built motor 500+whp is my goal this is going to be a circuit/drift car only no street use is intended .

http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/083.jpg
http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/StreetWarrior.jpg
http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/0607071905.jpg
http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/083.jpg
http://i852.photobucket.com/albums/ab87/95isturbo/IMAG0109.jpg
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

AcSchnitzer318is

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 469
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2009, 10:44:47 AM »
LOL that's awesome!  S50 to m42 swap.  Haha... suck it 4 pot nay sayers.  :)


"A good memory for quotes combined with a poor memory for attribution can lead to a false sense of originality."

deekay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2009, 01:20:42 PM »
Quote from: 1991 E30 M42;83461
itb's are redundant with a turbo, save your money and buy an AEM ems


ITBs have been used with turbocharging on a couple of factory engines that i can think off off the top of my head; the most similar one to ours would be the nissan SR20DE in the pulsar/sunny gti-r.

what i think is interesting to note is that compared to the "vanilla" turbo engines found in the RWD nissans, the ITB'd engines used a T28 turbo instead of the usual T25 (same turbine, bigger compressor).

seeing as these engines actually did make about 30hp more than the non-ITBd turbos, i think that's a pretty strong argument against redundancy. engineers built these cars for rally homologation, not as "technology showcases", which makes me inclined to say they wouldn't have introduced more complexity unless it were really worth it.

anyway, OP: i'm working on it also. just have a lot going on atm. might need to pick up something else to daily so my 'vert can just live at the shop for a while.
5-lug'd big-braked torsen'd hardtop'd ITB'd m42 vert
"the e30 colin chapman would have built" ;)

quinn11m20

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2009, 01:34:19 PM »
I know everyone states thier personal opinion on this website. So I will give you mine. Whether you like it or not. I think you can do whatever you want to to your car. I personally don't give a shit if you little fuck tards wanna tell me about how you know some other fuck ass that has put ITB's and a turbo and your personal opinion is that "you don't think its a good idea". I say let the dude do what he wants to his car. I think its an awesome idea and if it produces more power and he/she blows up their motor for it. Well so be it.

I work with a bunch of American muscle guys and they ragged on me about owning a piece of German Engineering. Well I showed them. Now all of them if not most are looking to get into SOLO GTII trials. Its BMW this and that.

Let the guy do what he want to his car. If you don't have anything productive to add THEN DON'T. Just that simple. OUT!

dwtaylorpdx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 79
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2009, 01:35:42 PM »
Its worth it IF you have the rest of the stuff to go with it.

IE: Fully ported head, cams pistons block work etc.

The cost of ITB throttle bodies buys a LOT of internal engine work.

Dave

quinn11m20

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2009, 01:37:24 PM »
Very true Dave, very true.

deekay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 222
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2009, 02:17:15 PM »
Quote from: dwtaylorpdx;83566
Its worth it IF you have the rest of the stuff to go with it.

IE: Fully ported head, cams pistons block work etc.

The cost of ITB throttle bodies buys a LOT of internal engine work.

Dave


that bit of "forum wisdom" gets passed around a lot. direct experience has caused me to disagree with it.

put simply, combined with an exhaust, MarkD chip and 24lb/hr injectors, the dbilas itb/alpha-N setup provided -noticeable- gains on a stock m42 longblock. most noticeable is a willingness to wind out all the way to 7k rpm. think about it- replace the 80's-tech flapping-door AFM with a nice big open intake, and get rid of the first-generation intake manifold for something designed to put the powerband at the top of the tach, and the engine is going to flow more at high RPM. this should not surprise anyone.

i don't know who started the rumor that ITBs are "only worthwhile on built/race engines", but they were wrong. if anything, the opposite is true- if you've spent the money on headwork and cams but are still using the AFM and e30 intake manifold, you are probably leaving power on the table.
5-lug'd big-braked torsen'd hardtop'd ITB'd m42 vert
"the e30 colin chapman would have built" ;)

RouteZeroDesign

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 136
    • View Profile
318is turbo with itb's
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2009, 08:21:40 PM »
I think this a rare occasion where you are both right.

On an engine like the m42/m44, where the intake manifold is a massive deliberate restriction in power
(for emissions purposes, to keep it's power away from the "higher" models and as a side effect of the hunt for more torque),
then throttle bodies on their own when combined with proper tuning and fuel/spark supporting mods, will make a massive difference in power and the freeness of the engine.

However, in the case of an engine like the F20c or K20a found in some of the more recent Hondas, throttle bodies become more of a supporting mod for head or cam work, rather than a completely independent mod.
Thats not to say you wont make more power from a change to ITBs on a K20/F20, but the increase in power will be less dramatic compared to an m42/m44.

The main difference is that on an m42/m44, the main restriction is the intake manifold, where as on a K20/F20, the intake is quite evenly matched to the head, and both are quite high performing parts to begin with.




Regarding independent throttle bodies combined with forced induction, they are generally not used other than to compensate for a biased manifold design and/or where fine adjustment of the individual runner flow is necessary.
For the GTI-R and the Skyline GT-R, i think it was equal parts of both.
On GTI-R for example, the intake manifold was at an almost perpendicular angle to the runners due to space restriction in the engine bay,
and also the car was designed with the intention of being homologated for racing, so fine adjustment of the individual runner flow was desirable.

Whether the same principle applies to the m42/m44, i dont know, as i have yet to build my manifold.
However, the evidence seems to suggest that they are a good idea, as with the car linked above, i read somewhere that it is making signifigant hp. (400+bhp)
http://s90.photobucket.com/albums/k267/Bonje_80/318is%20turbo/

I think this could be down to the throttle bodies being able to compensate for the reasonably perpendicular manifold design caused by the long intake runners (which are good for torque) almost like having your cake and eating it too : ).

I will state however, that i certain cases like on high powered Skyline GT-R, the independent throttle bodies start to become a restriction when compared to a single throttle body, but this mod is generally combined with a very well designed intake manifold.

This is all based upon my own personal experience, reading engine design books, talking with engineers and through my college work.
It is by no means fact, just my observations on the scenario which i hope are correct, or at least make SOME sort of sense.

Quinn11m20
It was unfortunate that you cursed in your post, as you managed to dilute an otherwise valid point.
Cars are made for having fun. Whether it is having fun while building the car, or having fun with the car you've built, it is important to do things in a way that suits you. Forget trends and forum opinion, it is YOUR car at the end of the day.
« Last Edit: December 27, 2009, 08:26:02 PM by RouteZeroDesign »