Thanks kenika65. I'll try that.
Peerless, an entire rebuild? This is news to me. BMWs are always made well, made to last a long time, and on a large number of occasions, they do exactly that. I wouldn't be afraid to put another 100,000 miles on it before I even think about selling it. I was not under the impression that there were other things besides timing chain components and oil pan bolts randomly falling out that make this engine a bad choice. If you take good care of your car and fix problems immediately when they come along, there should be no need for a rebuild unless there comes an unexpected catastrophe. This is what I was taught. This is what my experience with cars is. I know I am 17 and I don't know everything, but I pick up all the information I ever want to know from my father who knows his fair share. I know every engine is different, but here's an example. We have a 1997 Ford Explorer Limited with 200,000 miles on it. We never rebuilt it, never did serious work on the engine, or any part of the truck at all, only regular maintenance, and fixing a leak in the transmission. Ford has been known to be total crap, mainly their cars of course, but the engine was from the Mustang. I figure if Ford can make an engine that doesn't require a rebuild every 100,000 miles, why can't BMW, a much much better company? That being said, you have experience with this engine and I do not. You have experience with timing chain powered cars, I do not. You would know, I would not. It just seems ridiculous to think a BMW m42 engine is as well made as the engine out of a Chevrolet Cavalier. Maybe you get 120,000 miles out of it before it explodes.
Just whatever my $0.02 is worth. I bought this car because of it's reliability. I trust BMW to make excellent cars. My dad had one and it treated him greatly. I know several people that have the same story. I do not want to hear a rebuild is necessary. But like I said, you have the experience, I don't.