Author Topic: 318 GM swap questions  (Read 9343 times)

tjts1

  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 1109
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2007, 09:30:35 PM »
Quote from: DaywalkeR;30890
I believe what he means is that the car will lose its great (almost 50-50) weight ballance, not that it will lack performance ;)

Look up the weight of an LS1.
Sold but not forgotten

This is whats wrong with your car.
http://www.m42club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2742
[/thread]

christophbmw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 670
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #16 on: August 02, 2007, 08:29:53 PM »
that Z3 would have looked better with a bmw quad turbo V12 :D
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

2002maniac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 518
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #17 on: August 02, 2007, 08:50:52 PM »
Quote from: tjts1;30896
Look up the weight of an LS1.


The OP stated that he wants to do a 3.8 swap.  that would be quite a bit heavier than an LS1

1991 E30 M42

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 835
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #18 on: August 02, 2007, 09:14:57 PM »
Why stop at a V8 if your going to kill the balance of the car anyway

thebigbadyeti

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #19 on: August 03, 2007, 09:08:16 AM »
Thank you 2002 maniac for understanding my thoughts on the subject. If memeory serves me correct, and believe me i am not speaking with the confidence of jesus, but i think that the CAST IRON SUPERCHARGED 3.8 from gm weighs more than the superb ls2. I think the ls2 may actually weigh less than bimmers sixes... but a 3.8 swap is nonsensical in my opinion.

BY the way tjts1 i was knocking the weight of the 3.8, not your precious lsx i actually like those motors.
« Last Edit: August 03, 2007, 09:10:55 AM by thebigbadyeti »

gearheadE30

  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1245
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #20 on: August 03, 2007, 10:07:37 AM »
Many of the new LS- motors are aluminum, and are actually very light for the massive displacement. I'd be more worried about chassis twist with the massive torque...

1991 318is Turbo
1989 Caprice Classic Wagon named Humphrey
1979 Suzuki GS750E

tjts1

  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 1109
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #21 on: August 03, 2007, 10:00:31 PM »
Quote from: 1991 E30 M42;30964
Why stop at a V8 if your going to kill the balance of your check book anyway


fixed! :p
Sold but not forgotten

This is whats wrong with your car.
http://www.m42club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2742
[/thread]

christophbmw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 670
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2007, 01:10:57 PM »
Quote from: gearheadE30;30991
Many of the new LS- motors are aluminum, and are actually very light for the massive displacement. I'd be more worried about chassis twist with the massive torque...


plexiglass windows :D. i forgot where i saw it but some guy on the internet put a blown 350 in a 2002 or something (i forget it was like 2 years ago, i saw the video on the i-net) but anyways he was doing the 1/4 mile and he blew out like 3 windows or something from chassis torque.....it was wicked!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

kramerica5000

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 184
    • View Profile
how about a an s2000 motor
« Reply #23 on: August 04, 2007, 11:11:13 PM »
A buddy of mine just bought a wrecked s2000 with a perfect motor for $5400. As noted above, that's less than what it would cost to get about 200hp from the m42, plus you picked up a wrecked s2000 you could part it out and prolly break even. I have no idea what it would take to pull off the swap, and I wouldn't try it myself . . . but it did make me think: 240hp bone stock, similar weight, totally reliable . . . not bad.

Here's one that was stuffed into an e36 in some quirky Japanese show.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCo00asduEQ

thebigbadyeti

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 42
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #24 on: August 05, 2007, 12:21:27 PM »
ooo. now thats interesting... wish i didnt hate hon duhs... but that is really a nice thought. (no sarcasm)

D. Clay

  • Former *********
  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1330
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #25 on: August 05, 2007, 04:38:30 PM »
Quote from: gearheadE30;30991
Many of the new LS- motors are aluminum, and are actually very light for the massive displacement. I'd be more worried about chassis twist with the massive torque...
Definitely given the look of those two frame rails on the Z roadster in the picture above. Soft tops are notorious for flex to start with.
One source gives the weight of an LS2 with all the accessories at about 448 pounds. Then you would need a little more weight in a transmission to handle the extra power.
How much does a 3.8 supercharged motor weigh? An M42?

christophbmw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 670
    • View Profile
318 GM swap questions
« Reply #26 on: August 06, 2007, 07:22:58 PM »
Quote from: D. Clay;31105
Definitely given the look of those two frame rails on the Z roadster in the picture above. Soft tops are notorious for flex to start with.

ha, now that you mention it, i remember "getting on it" in a newer 2.5 Z3 and watching the whole windshield frame flex......you could actually see it move :eek:,  but then again i was pretty sidways at 30mph doing a speedshift to 2nd :o.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]