M47 cranks (correct)
E46 320d. 1997-2001. Not the M47N
E39 520d. 1999-2003
E46 318d. 2001-2003/04 Not the M47N
* 1999-2004 Rover 75 CDT
Correct crank
M47D20
* 100 kW (134 hp) and 280 N·m (207 ft·lbf)
o 1999-2001 E46 320d
o 2000-2003 E39 520d
* 85 kW (114 hp) and 265 N·m (195 ft·lbf)
o 1999-2001 E46 318d
Not correct crank
M47TUD20
* 85 kW (114 hp) and 280 N·m (207 ft·lbf)
o 2001-2005 E46 318d
* 110 kW (148 hp) and 330 N·m (243 ft·lbf)
o 2001-2005 E46 320d
o E83 X3 2.0d
* 2004-2005 Rover 75 CDTi
Not correct crank
M47TU2D20
* 90 kW (121 hp) and 280 N·m (207 ft·lbf)
o E87 118d
o E90/E91 318d
* 120 kW (161 hp) and 340 N·m (251 ft·lbf)
o E60/E61 520d
o E87 120d
o E90/E91 320d
Thanks for the reference mate!
BTW, on BMW TIS 2007, I found out that E46 318d M47N has 90mm stroke without flywheel balancer and looked similar to E46 318d M47 crankshaft with 88mm stroke
The price of both crankshafts are similar, according to this site:
http://bmwfans.info/original/E46/Lim/318d-M47N/ECE/R/N/2004/10/mg-11/ill-11_3513/If it can be used with E36 S50 B30 US M3 piston which has 86mm diameter and 32.8mm compression distance plus 135mm conrod length, the resulting displacement is 2,091cc (86mm x 90mm) with 1,5 conrod ratio. Off course you need to enlarge the bore to 86mm (2mm larger for m42 or 1mm larger for M44)
The total deck height will 211.80mm or it will sits 0.35mm lower than M42/M44 standard deck height.
What do you think?