Bumping this thread up. I have an M40 single-mass, non-AC flywheel (ironically, I bought it from MikeDE) to replace my dual mass 91' 318i m42 flywheel. However, I've since installed a DASC, which I'm running basically as intended by Downing Atlanta. Is the M40 single-mass flywheel with oem clutch going to be stout enough? If not, is there a beefier clutch I can use with the M40 flywheel?
I bought my 318is already with a DASC (M44 but same dual mass flywheel/clutch as M42). Not sure how old the clutch was when I bought it, but it didn't like some acceleration "testing" I did and started slipping after that.
I found that M50/M52 flywheel/clutches (dual mass) were a similar weight (some are a little lighter) and are a bit larger in diameter so should stand up to the extra power/torque from the DASC.
I found a used M50 flywheel and good clutch and fitted them. Although a touch heavier I don't notice any difference.
Years ago I had a M40 flywheel fitted to my E30 318is (M42, no DASC) and didn't notice any difference due to the lightweight except a bit more vibration at lower engine speeds under load. It didn't seem any faster to me and I did some acceleration testing and it was at best 1/10s better to 100km/h.
If you really want some significant improvement I would look at much lighter flywheels with bigger clutches like the RHD Engineering flywheels (
http://racehead.com.au/products-page/engine-components/bmw-light-flywheel-m50-m52-m42-m44/).
But you can also get a heavy duty clutch and pressure plate for the M40 flywheel (or get the pressure plate modified to be stronger).