Author Topic: Camshafts Standard Vs. Schrick  (Read 2554 times)

cecotto

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
    • http://www.cecotto.dk
Camshafts Standard Vs. Schrick
« on: February 22, 2007, 07:02:53 PM »
Browsing old files i found this:

It's a comparison between a standard intake cam (The inner curve), and a schrick intake (Outer curve)

The measurements were taken with a dialguage and a degree wheel.

The best way of making the measurement would be on a flat tappet, ant not with the pointy dialguage directly on the cam... (I did the pointy thing..) But it still gives a worthwile comparison.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2007, 07:05:37 PM by cecotto »
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Steffen Otto Jensen
E30 318is
E30 M3

bmwman91

  • Administrator
  • Legendary
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 33
  • Posts: 2798
    • View Profile
    • http://www.e30tuner.com/
Camshafts Standard Vs. Schrick
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2007, 10:23:14 PM »
You got a copy of this Excel file?  I would LOVE to get my hands on a plot of the stock cam profile!  If so, wanna email me one?  TIA

06/05/2011 - 212,354 miles
Visit HERE for a plethora of 318iS stuff and some other randomness.  Would you say I have a, plethora, of pinatas?

cecotto

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
    • http://www.cecotto.dk
Camshafts Standard Vs. Schrick
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2007, 01:02:26 AM »
I'm actually in the process of making some new measurements using a flat tappet on the cam instaead. Of both standard, schrick and the catcams i'm running on my own build.  When that is finished i'll be happy to share.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Steffen Otto Jensen
E30 318is
E30 M3

D. Clay

  • Former *********
  • Legendary
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 1330
    • View Profile
Camshafts Standard Vs. Schrick
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2007, 04:11:16 PM »
My experience with cams is limited but I do know that some vary quite a bit. I know a motor builder that invested in a computerized cam profiler. What they found was an amazing variation between lobes on the same cam and a variation from the stated profiles.