MLM,
I agree with you:-) Sorry for the confusion. It may not be all the different units out there but there are definitely some. I should have said some. Then I should have said, the more control and options you want, the more expensive it gets...LOL Unless you stick with MS which is very reasonable.
He also wanted to use the Dbilas A-N control unit set up and you couldn't tune that without getting more equipment i.e.. an emulator. It's still a chip based system. I had a chip based A-N on my M3 back in the day and it was rough. They now have A-N systems for tuning fuel but the spark is still chip based. Then you get into the full stand alone and that's where the knowledge and the $$$ comes into play with "some" units.

Running "true" Alpha N and running MAP are two different worlds. I won't run A-N on a street car unless it's blended like you're saying and it's not on the stock ECU. It doesn't have the stability as MAP does. Any change in altitude and your tuner had better have made all of the necessary changes in multiple maps or Kaboom! This made all the maps run way richer than necessary because it was an extrapolation of what could be and not what actually was. That also meant loss of power being on the excessive rich side to be safe mentality. Also, any change you make to the engine, i.e. cams, air filter, exhaust etc... you have to retune the engine to compensate for that. That's not fun for a street car. MAP or a blend would be much better suited for the street.
If you are going MAP, with adding the ITB's that he wanted, this creates the issue of taking the sample from all 4 inlets instead of just 1 or each set of ITB's. So you need to build a balance bar to draw from for your sample for a stable signal. It's all in how you want to tune the engine.
Cheers,
~Ralph