yeah I'd thought the same, but after driving it i'd be so surprised if the timing was just 2D and rpm based, as it feels far too good. I have a map that i've put some time into for the MS and have tried a few MS spark maps based on other 16v 4 pot motors, and nothing feels anywhere near as good as the motronic! The MS maps were all 12x12 3D and added timing as the manifold pressure dropped. If the motronic was 2D, the MS should have felt much better. The sparks actually feel really good, performance-wise its quicker on full load than my MS map, and driving around it just feels much smoother. Certainly not like an e36 in limp mode where the idle goes to crap, performance feels crap, fuel economy goes nuts and the timing feels retarded.
The idle only felt off when I disconnected the TPS, i believe this is because the motronic has an idle routine, and this was not engaged when the TPS was disconnected, as the motronic couldn't tell it would be an idle condition with no indication that there's no throttle.
I vaguely remember trying running with no AFM with MS controlling fuel on the rollers last time I was there, and do recall that we got the same max power figure.... hmmm.
I've not driven the car too far yet, will be doing 300 odd miles tomorrow, all motorway, and should be able to tell how good the timing map really is then.
Unfortunately my timing light will probably help very little. I will have a go later today, but without a rolling road (and info under load), I think i'll get minimal info, as I'm pretty certain its not a 2D map - i may be wrong though! It will be on the rollers soon enough, and i'll get an accurate timing map made then.